EU-tuomioistuin: Rikoksesta epäillyillä lapsilla tulee olla käytännöllinen ja tehokas mahdollisuus asianajoapuun

Judgment of the Court in Case C-603/22 | M.S. and Others (Procedural rights of a child)

Fair trial: minors subject to criminal proceedings must have the practical and effective opportunity to be assisted by a lawyer

Such assistance must be offered at the latest by the time they are first questioned by the police Criminal proceedings against three minors were brought before a Polish court. They were charged with having broken into the buildings of a disused former holiday centre.

During those proceedings, it was found that the suspects had been questioned by the police in the absence of a lawyer. Before they were first questioned, neither they nor their parents had been informed of their rights or the conduct of the proceedings. The court-appointed lawyers therefore requested that previous statements made by the suspects be removed from the file as evidence.

The national court, questioning the effectiveness of the procedural guarantees in place for minors during the pre-trial phase, made a reference to the Court of Justice. The national court is uncertain whether, in particular, the national provisions comply with EU law and what conclusions should be drawn from any incompatibility.

The Court holds that children who are suspects or accused persons must have the practical and effective opportunity to be assisted by a lawyer – a court-appointed lawyer where necessary. That obligation must be fulfilled before they are first questioned by the police or another law enforcement or judicial authority and, at the latest, from the time of that questioning. In principle, those authorities cannot carry out questioning of a child who does not actually receive such assistance. Persons who have reached the age of 18 during the criminal proceedings must not automatically lose the rights conferred on minors by EU law, in particular the right of access to a lawyer. The benefit of those rights must continue where it is appropriate having regarding to all the circumstances of the case, including the maturity  and the vulnerability of the persons concerned.

The Court notes that minors must be informed of their procedural rights as soon as possible, at the latest before they are first questioned. The information must be communicated in a simple and accessible way, adapted to their specific needs. A standard document, intended for adults, does not meet those requirements. As regards incriminating evidence contained in statements made by a minor during questioning carried out in breach of his or her rights, EU law does not require the Member State to provide for the possibility for the national court to declare such evidence inadmissible. However, that court must be able to verify that those rights have been respected and to draw all the inferences resulting from their breach, in particular as regards the probative value of the evidence in question.

It is for the national court to verify whether the Polish national legislation at issue is compatible with EU law. It is also required to interpret, so far as is possible, national law in conformity with EU law in order to ensure its full effectiveness. If such an interpretation is not possible, the national court is required to disapply, of its own  motion, any national provisions or practice which appear to be incompatible with it.

Press release